The influence of supervisory style on supervision outcoming among undergraduate trainee counselors

Norasyikin, Beddu (2019) The influence of supervisory style on supervision outcoming among undergraduate trainee counselors. [Final Year Project Report] (Unpublished)

	PDF The influence of supervisory style on supervision outcoming among undergraduate trainee counselors (24 pgs).pdf Download (1MB)
	PDF (Please get the password from ACADEMIC REPOSITORY UNIT, ext: 082-583913/ 082-583914) The influence of supervisory style on supervision outcoming among undergraduate trainee counselors (fulltext).pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (14MB)

Abstract

The study aimed to investigate the influence of supervisory styles on supervision outcome among undergraduate trainee counsellors. This study was quantitative in nature with correlational research design to study both of the influence and relationship between supervisory styles and supervision outcome which trainee counsellor's satisfactions. 100 respondents from UUM and UMS were recruited. Stratified random sampling technique was utilized to select the respondent and proportional stratification was used to determine the sample size of each stratum. Supervisory Styles Inventory (SSI) and Supervisory Satisfaction Questionnaire (SSQ) was the instrument used in this study. The System Approach to Supervision (SAS) Model served as the basis to carry out the study. The results of the study were analyzed by using Pearson's product-moment Coefficients and Multiple Regression. Based on the findings, the supervisory styles showed that there was significant relationship with supervision outcome (r= 0.49, p< 0.05). Three of supervisory styles which were attractive (r= 0.48, p< 0.05), interpersonally sensitive (r= 0.48, p< 0.05) and task-oriented (r= 0.42, p< 0.05). The supervisory styles also showed there was significant influence with supervision outcome. Among the three supervisory styles, attractive and interpersonally sensitive was the most influence on supervision outcome (R2=0.23, Adjusted R2=0.22, F (1, 98) = 29.05, p<0.05). The findings of this study perhaps could expand knowledge and understanding on the individual differences to supervision field. Supervisors could examine and reflect upon their styles based on theoretical framework provided and can restructure the styles. Lastly, it also can improve the quality and effectiveness of supervision for both supervisor and supervisee.

Actions (For repository members only: login required)

View Item