A Comparative Study on Quality of Life among Youths with and without Disabilities

Rohana, Jani and Abd Aziz, Alias and Nur Fatihah, Abdullah Bandar and Ruth Selvaranee, Arunasalam (2018) A Comparative Study on Quality of Life among Youths with and without Disabilities. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 26 (2). 689 -704. ISSN 0128-7702

[img]
Preview
 PDF
A Comparative Study on Quality of Life among Youths (abstract).pdf
Download (373kB) | Preview
Official URL: http://www.pertanika.upm.edu.my

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to compare the self-perceived Quality of Life (QoL) between disabled and non-disabled youths in Malaysia using the WHOQOL-BREF (World Health Organisation Quality of Life - Abbreviated version) instrument. A cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey of 300 disabled students and a control group comprising 523 non-disabled students from Malaysian higher learning institutions were the subjects for this study. The score for each domain was computed using the formula outlined by WHOQOLBREF. Descriptive analysis was used to analyse the characteristics of the respondents. Due to the non-normality of the score distribution, nonparametric Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare the mean scores of each domain across selected demographic variables. The mean age of the disabled students was 21.7 years old (SD=1.9), while that of the non-disabled students was 22.3 years old (SD=2.6). As expected, the mean total QoL score (TotQoL) of the non-disabled students was higher than that of the students with disabilities. Except for the social relationships domain, the disabled students had significantly higher mean scores for the physical health, psychological health and environment domains compared with the control group. For the disabled group, no significant difference was observed between males and females in the mean TotQoL as well as in the four domains. Hearing-impaired students were found to score the lowest TotQoL among the categories of disabled students. They also scored the lowest for the social relationships domain, with a mean score of 5.91 compared with 16.26 and 15.98 for visually- and mobility-impaired students, respectively. In conclusion, WHOQOL-BREF is a useful instrument for assessing QoL for various groups of people. Accessing the QoL of youth including PWDs could assist relevant policy-makers and stakeholders in identifying problems faced by PWDs and in designing relevant intervention programmes.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: Akvardar, Y., Akdede, B. B., Özerdem, A., Eser, E., Topkaya, Ş., & Alptekin, K. (2006). Assessment of quality of life with the WHOQOL-BREF in a group of Turkish psychiatric patients compared with diabetic and healthy subjects. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 60(6), 693–699. Andelman, R., Board, R., Carman, L., Cummins, R., Ferriss, A., Friedman, P., & Veenhoven, R. (1998). Quality of life definition and terminology: A discussion document from the international society of quality of life studies (Monograph). Blacksburg: International Society of Quality of Life Studies. Bredemeier, J., Wagner, G. P., Agranonik, M., Perez, T. S., & Fleck, M. P. (2014). The World Health Organization quality of life instrument for people with intellectual and physical disabilities (WHOQOL-Dis): Evidence of validity of the Brazilian version. BMC Public Health, 14(1), 538. Caron, J., Lecomte, Y., Stip, E., & Renaud, S. (2005). Predictors of quality of lifein schizophrenia. Community Mental Health Journal, 41(4), 399–417. Chen, K. H., Wu, C. H., & Yao, G. (2006). Applicability of the WHOQOL-BREF on early adolescence. Social Indicators Research, 79(2), 215–234. Dučinskienė, D., Kalėdienė, R., & Petrauskienė, J. (2003). Quality of life among Lithuanian university students. Acta med Lituan, 10(2), 76–81. Edwards, T. C., Patrick, D. L., & Topolski, T. D. (2003). Quality of life of adolescents with perceived disabilities. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 28(4), 233–241. Emond, I., Fortin, L., & Picard, Y. (1998). Perceptions of social support of students with learning disabilities and dropping out. Canadian Journal of Education, 23(3), 237–250. Fatima, M., & Shafique, M. (2015). Health and academic performance of university students: Direct and mediating effect of social capital. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 9(2), 357-379. Hasanah, C., Naing, L., & Rahman, A. (2003). World Health Organization quality of life assessment: Brief version in Bahasa Malaysia. Medical Journal of Malaysia, 58(1), 79–88. Kane, R. A. (2003). Definition, measurement, and correlates of quality of life in nursing homes: Toward a reasonable practice, research, and policy agenda. The Gerontologist, 43(suppl 2), 28–36. Krägeloh, C., Henning, M., Hawken, S., Zhao, Y., Shepherd, D., & Billington, R. (2011). Validation of the WHOQOL-BREF quality of life questionnaire for use with medical students. Education for Health, 24(2), 545. Li, K., Kay, N. S., & Nokkaew, N. (2009). The performance of the World Health Organization’s WHOQOL-BREF in assessing the quality of life of Thai college students. Social Indicators Research, 90(3), 489–501. Comparative Study on Youth Quality of Life Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. & Hum. 26 (2): 689 - 704 (2018) 703 Lin, J. H., Ju, Y. H., Lee, S. J., Lee, C. H., Wang, H. Y., Teng, Y. L., & Lo, S. K. (2009). Do physical disabilities affect self-perceived quality of life in adolescents? Disability and Rehabilitation, 31(3), 181–188. Lucas-Carrasco, R., Pascual-Sedano, B., Galán, I., Kulisevsky, J., Sastre-Garriga, J., & Gomez- Benito, J. (2010). Using the WHOQOL-DIS to measure quality of life in persons with physical disabilities caused by neurodegenerative disorders. Neurodegenerative Diseases, 8(4), 178–186. Min, S. K., Shin, W. C., Kim, K. I., Chung, J. I., & Kim, D. K. (2000). Comparison of quality of life between medical students and general college students. Journal of Korean Neuropsychiatric Association, 39(6), 1054–1060. Mubarak, A. (2005). Social functioning and quality of life of people with schizophrenia in the northern region of Malaysia. Australian e-Journal for the Advancement of Mental Health, 4(3), 200–209. Sallis, J. F., McKenzie, T. L., Kolody, B., Lewis, M., Marshall, S., & Rosengard, P. (1999). Effects of health-related physical education on academic achievement: Project SPARK. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 70(2), 127–134. Sararaks, S., Rugayah, B., Azman, A., Karuthan, C., & Low, L. (2001). Quality of life – How do Malaysian asthmatics fare? Medical Journal of Malaysia, 56(3), 350–358
Uncontrolled Keywords: WHOQOL-BREF, disabilities, university students, quality of life, comparative study, unimas, university, universiti, Borneo, Malaysia, Sarawak, Kuching, Samarahan, ipta, education, research, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak.
Subjects: H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)
Divisions: Academic Faculties, Institutes and Centres > Faculty of Cognitive Sciences and Human Development
Faculties, Institutes, Centres > Faculty of Cognitive Sciences and Human Development
Academic Faculties, Institutes and Centres > Faculty of Cognitive Sciences and Human Development
Depositing User: Abdullah Bandar
Date Deposited: 24 Aug 2018 02:29
Last Modified: 12 May 2023 02:21
URI: http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/21324

Actions (For repository members only: login required)

View Item View Item
UNIMAS Institutional Repository is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.